April 2 (UPI) -- If a woman avoids eating red meat, her risk of colon cancer is significantly reduced, according to a new study in Britain.
Researchers studied whether beef is associated with risk of colon and
rectal cancer compared with poultry, fish or vegetarian diets. The
findings were published Sunday in the International Journal for Cancer.
Previous studies have suggested that eating lots of red and processed
meat increases risk for colorectal cancer but the researchers said
there is limited available information about specific dietary patterns
and where cancer occurred in the bowel.
Researchers found that regular eaters of red meat had higher rates of
distal colon cancer compared with others. The cancer was found on the
descending section of the colon, where feces is stored.
"The impact of different types of red meat and dietary patterns on
cancer locations is one of the biggest challenges in the study of diet
and colorectal cancer," Dr. Diego Rada Fernandez de Jauregui, a
researcher in the Nutritional Epidemiology Group at University of Leeds
and the University of the Basque Country in Spain, said in a press
release. "Our research is one of the few studies looking at this
relationship and while further analysis in a larger study is needed, it
could provide valuable information for those with family history of
colorectal cancer and those working on prevention.
Among women, colorectal cancer is the third-leading cause of
cancer-related deaths and the third most common cancer behind breast
cancer and lung cancer, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2014, 24,517 women died from the disease and there were 66,596 diagnosed.
The new study used data from the United Kingdom Women's Cohort Study,
which included 32,147 women from England, Wales and Scotland. The World
Cancer Research fund recruited them between 1995 and 1998, and tracked
them for an average of 17 years. The median age of participants was 52
at the beginning of the study.
A total of 462 colorectal cases were found, including 335 colon
cancers -- 172 were proximal and 119 were distal -- and 152 rectal
cancers.
Among those studied, 65 percent were classified as red meat eaters, 3
percent were poultry eaters, 13 percent were fish eaters and 19 percent
were vegetarians.
In the study, poultry eaters, fish eaters and vegetarian groups
generally were younger, had a lower body mass index and were more
physically active compared to red meat eaters.
Vegetarians showed the highest risk reduction compared to red meat eaters.
The researchers noted additional foods in the diet other than red
meat may help decrease the risk of colorectal cancer, including milk and
whole grains.
"Our study not only helps shed light on how meat consumption may
affect the sections of the colorectum differently, it emphasizes the
importance of reliable dietary reporting from large groups of people,"
said Dr. Janet Cade, a professor of nutritional epidemiology and public
health at the School of Food Science and Nutrition at Leeds and a
co-author on the study.
"With access to the United Kingdom Women's Cohort Study we are able
to uncover trends in public health and analyze how diet can influence
the prevention of cancer. Accurate dietary reporting provides
researchers with the information they need to link the two together."
When News Breaks Out, We Break In. (The 2014 Bloggies Finalist)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.