Source: Vanguard
When News Breaks Out, We Break In. (The 2014 Bloggies Finalist)
On
resumption in court yesterday, the prosecution counsel, told the court
that Nnamdi Kanu was yet to fully meet the requirement for his bail and
asked the Abuja court to discontinue its case against the IPOB leader.
Nnamdi Kanu raising his hands to applaud his supporters after he left the court in Abuja
|
We reported it here
yesterday that the State Security Service asked an Abuja magistrate
court to discontinue its case against the leader of the Indigenous
People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.
At the resumed hearing on the matter yesterday, Kanu, who the
government accused of engaging in criminal conspiracy, managing and
belonging to an unlawful society, as well as indulging in criminal
intimidation, contrary to section 97 (a)&(b) and section 397 of the
Penal Code, begged to be transferred to prison custody.
His lawyer, Vincent Egechukwu Obeta, insisted that transferring his
client to prison would enable him to have easy access to his legal
team.
He made the application shortly after the DSS urged the Magistrate
Court to hands-off Kanu’s trial. The DSS, through its lawyer, Moses
Idakwo, told the court that it has already secured an order of the
Federal High Court in Abuja to further detain Kanu for another 90 days.
It said that the order which was granted by Justice Ademola
Adeniyi, was to enable the government to conclude investigation into an
allegation that Kanu was involved in terrorism financing.
Consequently, the DSS, applied to withdraw the initial First
Information Report (FIR), it lodged against Kanu before the Chief
Magistrate Court, maintaining that the government would file a fresh
charge against Kanu before a higher court, once its ongoing
investigation is concluded.
Idakwo therefore asked Magistrate Usman to step down from the trial
on the ground that his court lacks the power and jurisdiction to
prosecute terrorism charges.
The application was vehemently opposed by Kanu’s lawyer Obeta, who
insisted that the bail earlier granted the accused person must firstly
be complied with before any application for transfer of the case to a
federal high court could be entertained.
After listening to both parties, Magistrate Usman adjourned the case till December 1 for ruling.
When News Breaks Out, We Break In. (The 2014 Bloggies Finalist)
No comments:
Post a Comment